Okay, given your assumption that we’re within the USA in 1937, you would not have any concrete proof that claims “The USSR has the GULAG system?”
Which is why I’m saying given you realize there are conditions in historical past the place the mass preponderance of proof says X is occurring, even when you do not have an ideal degree of proof, generally you need to take the comparatively minor danger to behave as if X is occurring. Otherwise you’ll be agnostic and impartial in all issues – which you are not. We’ve all seen you proper right here on this message board take positions and assume details which you do not have 100% proof for, so why is that this one a hitch in your potential to attract conclusions from the proof now we have?
Take for instance these gems from you:
“I’m in NYC and we had an enormous fucking blackout as a result of there was a chokepoint failure level.” Your “proof” the reason for the blackout was a chokepoint failure level? Based on media studies, not private proof. But these media studies you settle for for…causes?
“And but, individuals are FAR extra outraged over the 20k mortgage forgiveness per scholar, totaling underneath $600 billion, somewhat than the a number of trillions of bailouts given to company pedophiles.” Your proof “a number of trillions” of bailout went to “company pedophile?” WAY method lower than the Ukraine studies, nearly solely from nameless sources which have been proven to have been repeatedly flawed on main subjects.
“You know when the pedophiles working in Wall St tanked the US economic system?” Your proof is once more what, some Q shit?
“the pedophile politicians gave 16 trillion to Wall St after they fucked up, as a result of the banks have been too huge to fail.” Proof the politicians who gave the bailout have been pedophiles? More Q shit.
We might go on. Your publish historical past is totally of you making assumptions primarily based on skinny or zero proof – ranges of proof far much less properly supported than what’s popping out of Ukraine. So why the sudden “You want 100% proof to imagine something” commonplace when it is apparently “You want a mere scintilla of proof which matches my world view” for therefore many different subjects for you?
>chokepoint failure level
I labored for Con Edison on the time and have a number of relations and household pals working for them.
>a number of trillions
Worked on Wall St. throughout OWS and the monetary disaster, working for a minor (however nonetheless world) lending accomplice in IT. So sure, I had entry to the books.
>pedophiles
:^)
So yeah, all of my claims are primarily based on private data or data of blood or data of household. I can reference different sources, however just for idea, not for “this truly occurred” as a result of I don’t imagine them both.
Oh and in addition, do not say “they discovered blah blah palms behind their backs.” The state-controlled media says that they did. Whether they actually did or not, properly, you don’t have any proof. I keep in mind the Ghost of Kiev. Or when the maternity ward was “bombed” how there was a bucket of pink paint close to one of many doorways smeared with blood.
Also, you are taking a look at my publish historical past? Creepy, dude. Pic associated.
