AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X3D launched about six months in the past. I gave it a uncommon Editors’ Choice badge in my Ryzen 7 5800X3D overview, and I stand by that evaluation. But AMD made a giant mistake with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, and I hope it doesn’t repeat that mistake with the Ryzen 7 7700X3D (or no matter identify AMD finally ends up going with).

Next-gen 3D V-Cache processors are on the best way; AMD has already confirmed that. It’s no secret that AMD’s 3D-stacked cache is a profitable technique to prime the charts of the finest gaming processors, but when AMD holds the Ryzen 7 7700X3D as lengthy it held final gen’s model, it’s going to be robust to advocate.

Outclassed instantly

The Ryzen  7 5800X3D launched on April 20, 2022, and 6 months later, it’s not the gaming champion it as soon as was. Launched at $450, it was the go-to processor for gaming, outperforming chips that ran virtually twice as a lot. Now that Intel’s Raptor Lake and AMD’s Ryzen 7000 processors are right here, nevertheless, it doesn’t look as engaging.

Sure, the flagship Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X provide higher gaming efficiency, however that’s not the issue. The Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 7600X additionally outclass final gen’s 3D V-Cache chip in most video games, all whereas costing round $150 much less. At launch, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D claimed the second-highest end result we’d recorded in Forza Horizon 4, solely surpassed by Intel’s Core i9-12900K. Now, the Ryzen 7 7600X is sort of 16% quicker, whereas the Core i5-13600K is 20% forward.

In Far Cry 6, the place the Ryzen 7 5800X3D confirmed a dominating lead of 28% over the Ryzen 9 5950X, it now solely exhibits a couple of 4% lead over the Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 7600X. And in titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 the place the Ryzen 7 5800X3D struggled, the current-gen AMD and Intel midrange choices are some 17% forward.

In brief, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D has turn into out of date. It’s not a foul processor — I even have one in a small kind issue PC for gaming on the sofa — however there’s little cause to choose one up now. It’s costlier than newer processors that provide higher efficiency, plain and easy. At launch, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D was an enormous worth win for avid gamers, but it surely solely stole the limelight for a short time.

And that’s a disgrace for avid gamers. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D was by no means an incredible processor general, taking a transparent backseat to its rivals in mainly each process however gaming. Still, it provided an enormous enhance in gaming efficiency at a value that Intel and even AMD itself couldn’t match with processors in the primary lineup. I hope the Ryzen 7 7700X3D arrives sooner, so it could actually have the time to shine that it deserves.

All eyes on CES

Hopefully, we’ll have a clearer view of AMD’s 3D V-Cache plans quickly. Rumors say that the corporate will announce two 3D V-Cache processors at CES, whereas we beforehand heard rumors that AMD deliberate to launch three chips. It doesn’t matter if we get two or three processors; I simply hope we see Ryzen 7000 3D V-Cache processors in any respect.

Ryzen 5000 launched in November 2020, and the Ryzen 7 5800X3D was the final processor to launch within the vary (a 12 months and a half after the primary processors rolled out). AMD’s present roadmap suggests it can launch next-gen Ryzen processors someday in late 2023, however that’s unconfirmed at this level. Regardless, one factor is obvious: The clock is ticking for the Ryzen 7 7700X3D to not be trumped by the technology that follows.

Hopefully, the additional time the Ryzen 7 5800X3D took within the oven was to refine 3D V-Cache, and we’ll get the Ryzen 7000 variations quickly. Right now, it’s robust to advocate the processor with the Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i5-13600K floating round, particularly for individuals who aren’t centered solely on gaming.

Although the Ryzen 7 7700X3D may prime gaming charts like its last-gen counterpart, we nonetheless don’t know at this level. It’s vital to attend for third-party testing earlier than making any assumptions concerning the chip.

Editors’ Recommendations