This is a web site for discussing roleplaying video games. Have enjoyable doing so, however there may be one main rule: don’t focus on political points that are not instantly and uniquely associated to the topic of the thread and about gaming. While this web site is devoted to free speech, the next won’t be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political dialogue, sockpuppeting (utilizing a number of and/or bogus accounts), disrupting matters with out contributing to them, and posting photographs that would get somebody fired within the office (an exterior hyperlink is OK, however clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you obtain a warning, please take it significantly and both transfer on to a different matter or steer the dialogue again to its authentic RPG-related theme.

Author
Topic: Another hit piece in opposition to Dungeons & Dragons  (Read 8078 occasions)

I don’t consider copyright ought to final for the lifetime of the creator. There’s no financial incentive for copyright to last more than 20 years or so.

If I write a e book when I’m 25, by the point I flip 46 I ought to cease receiving any monetary acquire from that e book? We’ll should disagree.

That’s not how copyright works. You’d nonetheless be capable to promote the e book and obtain cost for it.

Logged

---

I don’t consider copyright ought to final for the lifetime of the creator. There’s no financial incentive for copyright to last more than 20 years or so.

If I write a e book when I’m 25, by the point I flip 46 I ought to cease receiving any monetary acquire from that e book? We’ll should disagree.

That’s not how copyright works. You’d nonetheless be capable to promote the e book and obtain cost for it.

You might additionally promote my e book, although. Or a big writer might. So now I’m competing with myself, proper? Happy to be incorrect right here.

Logged

---