As educators, we try to instill vital considering abilities in our college students. These abilities are essential for problem-solving, making knowledgeable choices, and navigating our more and more advanced world. In an age of Generative AI (ChatGPT, Bard, and so forth…) analyze and critique grow to be rather more invaluable. One software that helps us categorize and improve these abilities is the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) framework. DOK is measured on a scale of 1 to 4, though I like to incorporate DOK 0 for duties corresponding to “copying” that don’t require any recall. In this text I’ll discover “What is DOK 2?”

Depth of Knowledge (DOK)

DOK, or Depth of Knowledge, was developed by Dr. Norman Webb as a framework to categorize duties in keeping with the complexity of considering required. DOK ranges vary from 1 (Recall and Reproduction) to 4 (Extended Thinking).

My fast and soiled for DOK:

DOK isn’t how arduous a job is, however relatively how a lot advanced reasoning there may be.

Robert Kaplinsky describes in his weblog how constructing a rocket to the moon is troublesome, however there’s a information on find out how to construct it and should you comply with the instructions it ought to work. Complex is elevating a toddler. What works with one youngster doesn’t essentially work with one other. 

What is DOK 2

DOK 2, additionally termed “Skill/Concept,” includes:

1. Understanding Concepts: Going past mere recall, college students at DOK 2 interact with content material, understanding the relationships between concepts.

2. Applying Skills and Concepts: At this stage, college students can use a talent or idea in a state of affairs that requires resolution making, reasoning, or each.

3. Processing Information: Students typically have to categorize, manage, evaluate, or distinction data to finish DOK 2 duties.

Examples of DOK 2 duties embrace:

Mathematics:

1. Given a sequence, college students predict the following few numbers primarily based on the sample.

2. Students classify triangles primarily based on aspect lengths and angles.

3. Interpreting data from a graph or chart.

4. Solving phrase issues that require a single operation.

5. Drawing conclusions from information in a desk.

English Language Arts:

6. Comparing and contrasting characters inside or between texts.

7. Making predictions a couple of story’s final result primarily based on textual proof.

8. Identifying the primary thought of a passage.

9. Interpreting the that means of a metaphor or simile.

10. Summarizing the plot of a narrative with out copying the textual content.

Science:

11. Designing an experiment to check the consequences of daylight on plant development.

12. Classifying animals primarily based on their traits.

13. Predicting the end result of a easy chemical response.

14. Drawing a meals chain primarily based on given data.

15. Interpreting outcomes from a fundamental lab experiment.

Social Studies:

16. Comparing two historic occasions or figures.

17. Interpreting data from a historic map.

18. Identifying the primary thought of a main supply doc.

19. Predicting the following occasion in a historic timeline.

20. Classifying kinds of authorities primarily based on given traits.

Physical Education:

21. Demonstrating the correct method for a fundamental volleyball serve.

22. Comparing the principles of two completely different video games or sports activities.

23. Interpreting the advantages of standard train from a chart.

24. Designing a fundamental health routine primarily based on particular targets.

25. Predicting outcomes of sports activities occasions primarily based on workforce statistics.

Music:

26. Comparing two items of music from completely different genres.

27. Interpreting the temper of a chunk primarily based on musical components.

28. Identifying patterns in a musical piece.

29. Predicting the following be aware in a melody primarily based on a sample.

30. Summarizing the theme of a music’s lyrics.

Art:

31. Comparing and contrasting two artwork items from completely different durations.

32. Interpreting the temper of a portray primarily based on shade decisions.

33. Designing a chunk impressed by a well-known artist.

34. Predicting traits in artwork primarily based on previous actions.

35. Summarizing the primary thought of an artwork piece with out copying it.

Foreign Language:

36. Comparing and contrasting cultural customs from two completely different nations.

37. Predicting the following line in a dialog primarily based on context.

38. Classifying verbs primarily based on conjugation patterns.

39. Interpreting the primary thought of a brief passage in a international language.

40. Designing a dialogue utilizing particular vocabulary phrases.

Health:

41. Comparing dietary information between two meals merchandise.

42. Interpreting a meals label to determine wholesome elements.

43. Designing a balanced meal plan for a day.

44. Predicting the well being results of a sure behavior or conduct.

45. Summarizing the steps of a primary help process.

Technology:

46. Comparing two completely different software program primarily based on their options.

47. Predicting the following pattern in know-how primarily based on present occasions.

48. Interpreting information from a digital analytics report.

49. Designing a fundamental webpage structure.

50. Summarizing the features of a selected digital software or software.

Critical Thinking is At Least DOK 2

When we speak about vital considering it means elevating duties previous merely recalling information or data. Following an algorithm or set of instructions, even arduous ones, are nonetheless DOK 1. DOK 1: “Identify the discriminant for a quadratic equation that isn’t presented in its standard format.” This requires the coed to do a number of steps and may be difficult. However, if the scholars follows the steps of their notes rigorously they are often profitable. There isn’t any stage of resolution making on this query.

Beware the DOK Wheel

If you Google search DOK absolutely you’ll come throughout the dreaded DOK wheel. As Erik Francis factors out, the wheel is inaccurate. It really requires your individual advanced evaluation of the duty to ask “how complex is the students level of reasoning?”

Did the scholars need to determine something out? Justify their reasoning? Note that “show your work” isn’t justifying reasoning. It is figuring out the steps of an algorithm that was adopted.

When you instantly present college students find out how to full a job, they usually comply with your steps to try this job, the DOK stage of the duty is diminished to recall. Are the scholars figuring out the patterns or are we telling them the patterns? This makes an enormous distinction relating to how college students method a job on their very own.