I’ve discovered myself needing to fill a niche in a cryptic crossword with a phrase that occurs to be the surname of an actor. However the surname they’ve may be very distinctive.

As an instance, as an instance the actor was John Malkovitch, and for the sake of argument the wordplay half is one thing do with an anagram of his identify, perhaps ‘Havoc Milk’.

Is it enough to only use their first identify because the definition half:

John inflicting havoc with spilt milk (10)

Or if is extra commonplace to make use of ‘actor’?

Actor inflicting havoc with spilt milk (10)

Or might I even get away with utilizing one in all their well-known (and even obscure) movie roles?

Virus performed havoc with spilt milk (10)

I’m not conversant in what requirements completely different setters have for these conditions, so I’m not sure how to do that effectively… I need to go for the latter one, because it suits a theme within the crossword however appears the least commonplace.