This is a website for discussing roleplaying video games. Have enjoyable doing so, however there’s one main rule: don’t talk about political points that are not instantly and uniquely associated to the topic of the thread and about gaming. While this website is devoted to free speech, the next won’t be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political dialogue, sockpuppeting (utilizing a number of and/or bogus accounts), disrupting matters with out contributing to them, and posting pictures that would get somebody fired within the office (an exterior hyperlink is OK, however clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you obtain a warning, please take it critically and both transfer on to a different subject or steer the dialogue again to its authentic RPG-related theme.

The RPGPundit’s Own Forum Rules
This a part of the location is managed by the RPGPundit. This is the place he discusses matters that he finds fascinating. You might publish right here, however perceive that there are limits. The RPGPundit can shut down any thread, subject of debate, or person in a thread at his pleasure. This a part of the location is basically his home, so maintain that in thoughts. Note that that is the one a part of the location the place political dialogue is permitted, however is regulated by the RPGPundit.

Pages: 1 … 155 156 [157]

Author
Topic: RPGnet’s decay (TBP insanity)  (Read 156325 instances)

Any one right here bear in mind Godwin’s Law?

Godwin initially developed the thought in 1990 as “a pure legislation of Usenet,” expressed within the following assertion: “As a web-based dialogue grows longer, the chance of a comparability involving Hitler approaches 1.” (A chance of 1 is a certainty.) A corollary to Godwin’s legislation states that after Hitler is talked about, that dialogue is ended. The implication is that the extent of discourse has devolved to the diploma that additional communication is pointless. According to Usenet custom, whoever talked about Hitler is deemed to have misplaced the argument.

Logged

---

Any one right here bear in mind Godwin’s Law?

Godwin initially developed the thought in 1990 as “a pure legislation of Usenet,” expressed within the following assertion: “As a web-based dialogue grows longer, the chance of a comparability involving Hitler approaches 1.” (A chance of 1 is a certainty.) A corollary to Godwin’s legislation states that after Hitler is talked about, that dialogue is ended. The implication is that the extent of discourse has devolved to the diploma that additional communication is pointless. According to Usenet custom, whoever talked about Hitler is deemed to have misplaced the argument.

I do, really. Sadly, like a variety of good Usenet traditions it has been buried below the load of years. There’s a great argument that this was the top results of Eternal September and the opening of the Internet to a bigger viewers.

Logged

---

Pages: 1 … 155 156 [157]