Home RPG Ukraine is below assault. It’s a full on warfare.

Ukraine is below assault. It’s a full on warfare.

0
Ukraine is below assault. It’s a full on warfare.

[ad_1]

This is a web site for discussing roleplaying video games. Have enjoyable doing so, however there’s one main rule: don’t focus on political points that are not instantly and uniquely associated to the topic of the thread and about gaming. While this web site is devoted to free speech, the next won’t be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political dialogue, sockpuppeting (utilizing a number of and/or bogus accounts), disrupting subjects with out contributing to them, and posting photos that would get somebody fired within the office (an exterior hyperlink is OK, however clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you obtain a warning, please take it severely and both transfer on to a different subject or steer the dialogue again to its authentic RPG-related theme.

The RPGPundit’s Own Forum Rules
This a part of the positioning is managed by the RPGPundit. This is the place he discusses subjects that he finds fascinating. You might submit right here, however perceive that there are limits. The RPGPundit can shut down any thread, subject of debate, or consumer in a thread at his pleasure. This a part of the positioning is basically his home, so maintain that in thoughts. Note that that is the one a part of the positioning the place political dialogue is permitted, however is regulated by the RPGPundit.



Author
Topic: Ukraine is below assault. It’s a full on warfare.  (Read 58004 occasions)

OMG.  I used to be out strolling in Virginia and stumbled on some mass graves.

What occurred right here?!  How is it totally different than these?


OMG.  I used to be out strolling in Virginia and stumbled on some mass graves.

What occurred right here?!  How is it totally different than these?

Once once more: as a result of they discovered civilians with their arms tied behind their backs, ropes round some necks, and execution wounds on them.

But I assume maintain spinning atrocities for…causes? It makes you look superior to disclaim torture and homicide.

« Last Edit: September 19, 2022, 04:39:59 PM by Mistwell »


Okay, given your assumption that we’re within the USA in 1937, you would not have any concrete proof that claims “The USSR has the GULAG system?”

Which is why I’m saying given you understand there are conditions in historical past the place the mass preponderance of proof says X is going on, even when you do not have an ideal stage of proof, typically you need to take the comparatively minor threat to behave as if X is going on. Otherwise you’ll be agnostic and impartial in all issues – which you are not. We’ve all seen you proper right here on this message board take positions and assume details which you do not have 100% proof for, so why is that this one a hitch in your means to attract conclusions from the proof we have now?

Take for instance these gems from you:

“I’m in NYC and we had an enormous fucking blackout as a result of there was a chokepoint failure level.” Your “proof” the reason for the blackout was a chokepoint failure level? Based on media reviews, not private proof. But these media reviews you settle for for…causes?

“And but, individuals are FAR extra outraged over the 20k mortgage forgiveness per scholar, totaling below $600 billion, slightly than the a number of trillions of bailouts given to company pedophiles.” Your proof “a number of trillions” of bailout went to “company pedophile?” WAY means lower than the Ukraine reviews, nearly completely from nameless sources which have been proven to have been repeatedly flawed on main subjects.

“You know when the pedophiles working in Wall St tanked the US financial system?” Your proof is once more what, some Q shit?

“the pedophile politicians gave 16 trillion to Wall St once they fucked up, as a result of the banks had been too huge to fail.” Proof the politicians who gave the bailout had been pedophiles? More Q shit.

We might go on. Your submit historical past is totally of you making assumptions primarily based on skinny or zero proof – ranges of proof far much less properly supported than what’s popping out of Ukraine. So why the sudden “You want 100% proof to imagine something” customary when it is apparently “You want a mere scintilla of proof which matches my world view” for therefore many different subjects for you?

>chokepoint failure level
I labored for Con Edison on the time and have a number of kinfolk and household pals working for them.

>a number of trillions
Worked on Wall St. throughout OWS and the monetary disaster, working for a minor (however nonetheless international) lending accomplice in IT. So sure, I had entry to the books.

>pedophiles
:^)

So yeah, all of my claims are primarily based on private data or data of blood or data of household. I can reference different sources, however just for idea, not for “this really occurred” as a result of I don’t imagine them both.

Oh and likewise, do not say “they discovered blah blah arms behind their backs.” The state-controlled media says that they did. Whether they actually did or not, properly, you don’t have any proof. I keep in mind the Ghost of Kiev. Or when the maternity ward was “bombed” how there was a bucket of crimson paint close to one of many doorways smeared with blood.

Also, you are my submit historical past? Creepy, dude. Pic associated.


Okay, given your assumption that we’re within the USA in 1937, you would not have any concrete proof that claims “The USSR has the GULAG system?”

Which is why I’m saying given you understand there are conditions in historical past the place the mass preponderance of proof says X is going on, even when you do not have an ideal stage of proof, typically you need to take the comparatively minor threat to behave as if X is going on. Otherwise you’ll be agnostic and impartial in all issues – which you are not. We’ve all seen you proper right here on this message board take positions and assume details which you do not have 100% proof for, so why is that this one a hitch in your means to attract conclusions from the proof we have now?

Take for instance these gems from you:

“I’m in NYC and we had an enormous fucking blackout as a result of there was a chokepoint failure level.” Your “proof” the reason for the blackout was a chokepoint failure level? Based on media reviews, not private proof. But these media reviews you settle for for…causes?

“And but, individuals are FAR extra outraged over the 20k mortgage forgiveness per scholar, totaling below $600 billion, slightly than the a number of trillions of bailouts given to company pedophiles.” Your proof “a number of trillions” of bailout went to “company pedophile?” WAY means lower than the Ukraine reviews, nearly completely from nameless sources which have been proven to have been repeatedly flawed on main subjects.

“You know when the pedophiles working in Wall St tanked the US financial system?” Your proof is once more what, some Q shit?

“the pedophile politicians gave 16 trillion to Wall St once they fucked up, as a result of the banks had been too huge to fail.” Proof the politicians who gave the bailout had been pedophiles? More Q shit.

We might go on. Your submit historical past is totally of you making assumptions primarily based on skinny or zero proof – ranges of proof far much less properly supported than what’s popping out of Ukraine. So why the sudden “You want 100% proof to imagine something” customary when it is apparently “You want a mere scintilla of proof which matches my world view” for therefore many different subjects for you?

>chokepoint failure level
I labored for Con Edison on the time and have a number of kinfolk and household pals working for them.

>a number of trillions
Worked on Wall St. throughout OWS and the monetary disaster, working for a minor (however nonetheless international) lending accomplice in IT. So sure, I had entry to the books.

>pedophiles
:^)

So yeah, all of my claims are primarily based on private data or data of blood or data of household. I can reference different sources, however just for idea, not for “this really occurred” as a result of I don’t imagine them both.

Oh and likewise, do not say “they discovered blah blah arms behind their backs.” The state-controlled media says that they did. Whether they actually did or not, properly, you don’t have any proof. I keep in mind the Ghost of Kiev. Or when the maternity ward was “bombed” how there was a bucket of crimson paint close to one of many doorways smeared with blood.

Also, you are my submit historical past? Creepy, dude. Pic associated.

You’re hand waiving “pedophiles” in all that? Even although that was greater than half of what you are responding to?

Yeah dude, you accepting and regurgitating Qanon pedophiles bullshit is related as to if you maintain your self to a typical of proof or not about world occasions.


I’m not about to incriminate myself. I’ll vaguely say that I do know individuals who had been a bit too younger and foolhardy and bought combined up in shit that they should not have been combined up in and people individuals have very deep pockets and really fascinating connections.


I’m not about to incriminate myself. I’ll vaguely say that I do know individuals who had been a bit too younger and foolhardy and bought combined up in shit that they should not have been combined up in and people individuals have very deep pockets and really fascinating connections.

That will not be enough proof to show the claims you make.


Slava Ukraina!


Thanks for the snigger, I wanted that this morning.


 


[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here