Could somebody please verify to see if my resolution beneath is appropriate? Thank you!
Sections of the gene sequence are separated by the codon CND, like beneath:
The underlined components are the proteins concerned. The first underlined half is the protein doing the motion(the primary protein talked about) whereas the second underlined half is the protein being acted upon(the second protein talked about). I’ve color-coded the underlined components to distinguish between proteins.
The different sections are the actions carried out. As hinted in Dr. Muzabique’s pocket book, the size of the underlined protein sequences impacts the motion sequences. If the primary protein(the performing protein) is lengthy, then the motion sequences will signify the actions within the command. If the performing protein is brief, then the motion sequences will signify the actions not within the command.
The motion sequences additionally appear to finish in both NNN or NAN, or a sequence of the 2. I’ll name these sequences “penguins”(as a result of why not) and the opposite a part of an motion sequence the polar bears. This half appears to rely upon the scale of the proteins. The third gene output provides us the important thing between the actions and the polar bears. For the motion sequence for developing(the polar bear is GCATGACATC), plainly it has N_NN_N because the penguin. It additionally looks like the blanks signify the primary and second protein lengths, so as, the place it’s A if the protein is brief and N if the protein is lengthy. For the motion sequence for chopping(polar bear: TGCCCACCCC) the penguin is N_N, and is dependent upon the second protein: whether it is brief then the clean is A, whether it is lengthy then the clean is N. For packing(polar bear: CTTTTCCACT) it’s just like the chopping penguin besides it is dependent upon the primary protein.