You’re watching your favourite late evening speak present, and the host Lavid Detterman is interviewing Kandy Offman. You have closed captions on, the textual content of which is proven beneath. The interview is, as you may need guessed, hilarious chaos. What’s the reason for the misunderstanding?
Lavid: …it is all enjoyable and video games till somebody loses a watch.
Kandy: Someone would not have a watch.
Lavid: What? How are you able to say that? You have two eyes.
Kandy: You would not have any eyes.
Lavid: I used to be speaking about you not me.
Kandy: I solely has one eye. Me would not have any.
Lavid: Ok, I’ll play alongside along with your delusion. What about spiders. How many eyes do spiders have?
Kandy: One
Lavid: And birds?
Kandy: Only one
Lavid: Dogs?
Kandy: None
Lavid: Cats?
Kandy: Still none
Lavid: Pigs?
Kandy: One
Lavid: Unicorns?
Kandy: One
Lavid: What about inanimate objects–let’s get extra summary, say oh I do not know–Wikipedia?
Kandy: Wikipedia has three eyes.
Lavid: Oh it does does it?
Kandy: No it solely has one eye.
Lavid: But you stated…
Why is the interview going so hilariously flawed?
