The Problem

The Request

Could somebody please verify to see if my answer beneath is appropriate? Thank you!

My Solution

Sections of the gene sequence are separated by the codon CND, like beneath:

The underlined elements are the proteins concerned. The first underlined half is the protein doing the motion(the primary protein talked about) whereas the second underlined half is the protein being acted upon(the second protein talked about). I’ve color-coded the underlined elements to distinguish between proteins.

The different sections are the actions achieved. As hinted in Dr. Muzabique’s pocket book, the size of the underlined protein sequences impacts the motion sequences. If the primary protein(the appearing protein) is lengthy, then the motion sequences will characterize the actions within the command. If the appearing protein is brief, then the motion sequences will characterize the actions not within the command.

The motion sequences additionally appear to finish in both NNN or NAN, or a sequence of the 2. I’ll name these sequences “penguins”(as a result of why not) and the opposite a part of an motion sequence the polar bears. This half appears to rely upon the dimensions of the proteins. The third gene output offers us the important thing between the actions and the polar bears. For the motion sequence for developing(the polar bear is GCATGACATC), plainly it has N_NN_N because the penguin. It additionally looks as if the blanks characterize the primary and second protein lengths, so as, the place it’s A if the protein is brief and N if the protein is lengthy. For the motion sequence for reducing(polar bear: TGCCCACCCC) the penguin is N_N, and is determined by the second protein: whether it is quick then the clean is A, whether it is lengthy then the clean is N. For packing(polar bear: CTTTTCCACT) it’s just like the reducing penguin besides it is determined by the primary protein.