Puzzles lateral considering – Almost half 1,000,000, but smaller than 100 Team FunTrove - December 22, 2022 0 [ad_1] lateral considering – Almost half 1,000,000, but smaller than 100 – Puzzling Stack Exchange Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange community consists of 181 Q&A communities together with Stack Overflow, the biggest, most trusted on-line neighborhood for builders to study, share their data, and construct their careers. Visit Stack Exchange Log in Sign up Puzzling Stack Exchange is a query and reply web site for many who create, clear up, and examine puzzles. It solely takes a minute to enroll. Sign as much as be part of this neighborhood Anybody can ask a query Anybody can reply The finest solutions are voted up and rise to the highest Asked 2 years, 11 months in the past Viewed 11k instances $begingroup$ Consider, for instance, the quantity 420109. It’s fairly huge, is not it? Not so removed from half 1,000,000. Yet it may be interpreted to be smaller than 100 with a quite simple trick, with out placing any mathematical operators between the digits, with out utilizing any mathematical operate on it, and with out erasing or hiding elements of it. How? Hint 1 There are a number of different 6-digit numbers this might work with, however not many. Hint 2 Not solely can it “be made smaller”, 420109 really is smaller than 100 from a sure viewpoint. There are only a few 6-digit numbers the place this may be utilized. requested Jan 14, 2020 at 7:12 vszvsz 1,69411 gold badge1313 silver badges2121 bronze badges $endgroup$ 10 $begingroup$ Pardon my French, however no entire quantity smaller than 100 may be bigger than 99, so this puzzle have to be utterly and totally sensible, as a result of 99 is “quatre-vingt-dix-neuf” or “four-twenty-ten-nine” in French. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 14:37 BassBass 70.1k66 gold badges155155 silver badges332332 bronze badges $endgroup$ 7 $begingroup$ Lateral considering right here: The 010 a part of the quantity seems to be like a % image, so the quantity might be considered as 42 % 9 which is lower than 100. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 11:03 JS1JS1 16.9k33 gold badges4848 silver badges9696 bronze badges $endgroup$ 6 $begingroup$ Well, seeing that that is lateral considering: You wrote 420109 utilizing 6 digits, and 100 utilizing 7 letters. So, it is smaller. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 8:08 CG.CG. 2,5901111 silver badges2525 bronze badges $endgroup$ 2 $begingroup$ Following up on @Earlien reply I believe the trick is to decompose 420109 as 4 20 10 9 and skim it in French This offers 99 = 4*20 + 10 + 9 which is one unit lower than 100 Similarly 420108 would learn as 98 answered Jan 14, 2020 at 14:40 SMRSMR 92555 silver badges77 bronze badges $endgroup$ 3 $begingroup$ Is it the best way it’s learn? Four “20’s” and 1 “09” = 89 answered Jan 14, 2020 at 13:24 EarlienEarlien 1,88022 silver badges3333 bronze badges $endgroup$ 6 $begingroup$ This is a very foolish concept, however: Put a minus signal earlier than it to make it -420109. It’s smaller than 100, and technically talking, I have never put a mathematical operator between the digits. It clearly would not match the primary trace, nevertheless it adheres to the wording of the particular puzzle. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 11:21 F1KrazyF1Krazy 7,52711 gold badge2929 silver badges6161 bronze badges $endgroup$ 1 $begingroup$ Well… there’s at all times… 100420109 Doesn’t appear to mesh with the concept that there are only a few of those 6-digit numbers that work, although. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 14:27 Ian MacDonaldIan MacDonald 12.8k11 gold badge3131 silver badges6262 bronze badges $endgroup$ $begingroup$ Although I actually like Bass’ concept, I need to provide one other, rule-bending, concept: Put in a decimal level (or a comma, relying the place you reside) and make it 4.20109 Now the quantity is unquestionably under 100 with out breaking the foundations: – Putting in a single pixel is as straightforward because it will get (and we need not study one other language!)– Not a mathematical operate– No hiding or erasing of numbers– Not a mathematical operator (though a mathematical image) F1Krazy 7,52711 gold badge2929 silver badges6161 bronze badges answered Jan 14, 2020 at 15:58 Jan T.Jan T. 8111 bronze badge $endgroup$ 2 $begingroup$ Two doable options: – It is smaller than 100, if you happen to write “100” very massive.– It is smaller than 100 of itself (or of another unspecified amount). answered Jan 14, 2020 at 8:21 Deusovi♦Deusovi 142k1515 gold badges495495 silver badges590590 bronze badges $endgroup$ $begingroup$ I believe the reply is 49 Because The very first thing I noticed was how the shapes of the letters match up. By transposing the two on the highest of the 4, it turns into a cool trying 4, however nonetheless a 4. Then place the 1 on it as effectively. Still a 4. Then the 0’s may be barely shrunk and positioned on high a part of the 9. I hope I’m not less than heading in the right direction. Otherwise, I’m crazier than I assumed. Sorry, in a rush. I used to be one of the best image I may do:) answered Jan 14, 2020 at 14:37 MacGyver88MacGyver88 5,23122 gold badges1010 silver badges4242 bronze badges $endgroup$ $begingroup$ 420109 1 00 00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 00 00 answered Jan 15, 2020 at 18:57 AcccumulationAcccumulation 1,00855 silver badges1212 bronze badges $endgroup$ 1 $begingroup$ 420109 is nineteen in base 420100 or within the checklist of multiples of 22111… I hoped this was a Prime factor…. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 19:46 TezraTezra 18144 bronze badges $endgroup$ $begingroup$ No trick concerned, as a result of it’s virtually half 1,000,000 however definitely rather a lot smaller than hundred (thousands and thousands). F1Krazy 7,52711 gold badge2929 silver badges6161 bronze badges answered Jan 14, 2020 at 18:23 QBruteQBrute 1,16899 silver badges1313 bronze badges $endgroup$ $begingroup$ This is the stupidest answer I’ve ever cooked up, however right here it’s anyway. Turn the 1 sideways to make it a divisor for a fraction. Now you get 420/09, which comes out to be approach lower than 100. This is, after all, monumentally silly and I hate it. If it is the appropriate reply, I can be unhappy. answered Jan 14, 2020 at 12:57 $endgroup$ Your privateness By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can retailer cookies in your system and disclose info in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Accept all cookies Customize settings [ad_2] LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
