Puzzling Stack Exchange is a query and reply web site for many who create, clear up, and examine puzzles. It solely takes a minute to enroll.
Anybody can ask a query
Anybody can reply
The finest solutions are voted up and rise to the highest
Asked
Viewed
11k instances
Consider, for instance, the quantity 420109. It’s fairly huge, is not it? Not so removed from half 1,000,000. Yet it may be interpreted to be smaller than 100 with a quite simple trick, with out placing any mathematical operators between the digits, with out utilizing any mathematical operate on it, and with out erasing or hiding elements of it.
How?
Hint 1
There are a number of different 6-digit numbers this might work with, however not many.
Hint 2
Not solely can it “be made smaller”, 420109 really is smaller than 100 from a sure viewpoint. There are only a few 6-digit numbers the place this may be utilized.
$endgroup$
10
Pardon my French, however no entire quantity smaller than 100 may be bigger than 99, so this puzzle have to be utterly and totally
sensible, as a result of 99 is “quatre-vingt-dix-neuf” or “four-twenty-ten-nine” in French.
$endgroup$
7
Lateral considering right here:
The 010 a part of the quantity seems to be like a % image, so the quantity might be considered as 42 % 9 which is lower than 100.
$endgroup$
6
Well, seeing that that is lateral considering:
You wrote 420109 utilizing 6 digits, and 100 utilizing 7 letters. So, it is smaller.
$endgroup$
2
Following up on @Earlien reply I believe the trick is to
decompose 420109 as 4 20 10 9 and skim it in French
This offers
99 = 4*20 + 10 + 9 which is one unit lower than 100
Similarly
420108 would learn as 98
$endgroup$
3
Is it the best way it’s learn?
Four “20’s” and 1 “09” = 89
$endgroup$
6
This is a very foolish concept, however:
Put a minus signal earlier than it to make it -420109. It’s smaller than 100, and technically talking, I have never put a mathematical operator between the digits.
It clearly would not match the primary trace, nevertheless it adheres to the wording of the particular puzzle.
$endgroup$
1
Well… there’s at all times…
100
420109
Doesn’t appear to mesh with the concept that there are only a few of those 6-digit numbers that work, although.
$endgroup$
Although I actually like Bass’ concept, I need to provide one other, rule-bending, concept:
Put in a decimal level (or a comma, relying the place you reside) and make it 4.20109
Now the quantity is unquestionably under 100 with out breaking the foundations:
– Putting in a single pixel is as straightforward because it will get (and we need not study one other language!)
– Not a mathematical operate
– No hiding or erasing of numbers
– Not a mathematical operator (though a mathematical image)
$endgroup$
2
Two doable options:
– It is smaller than 100, if you happen to write “100” very massive.
– It is smaller than 100 of itself (or of another unspecified amount).
$endgroup$
I believe the reply is
49
Because
The very first thing I noticed was how the shapes of the letters match up. By transposing the two on the highest of the 4, it turns into a cool trying 4, however nonetheless a 4. Then place the 1 on it as effectively. Still a 4. Then the 0’s may be barely shrunk and positioned on high a part of the 9.
I hope I’m not less than heading in the right direction. Otherwise, I’m crazier than I assumed.
Sorry, in a rush. I used to be one of the best image I may do:)
$endgroup$
420109
1 00 00
1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
1 00 00
$endgroup$
1
420109 is nineteen
in base 420100
or
within the checklist of multiples of 22111… I hoped this was a Prime factor….
$endgroup$
No trick concerned, as a result of
it’s virtually half 1,000,000 however definitely rather a lot smaller than hundred (thousands and thousands).
$endgroup$
This is the stupidest answer I’ve ever cooked up, however right here it’s anyway.
Turn the 1 sideways to make it a divisor for a fraction. Now you get 420/09, which comes out to be approach lower than 100. This is, after all, monumentally silly and I hate it. If it is the appropriate reply, I can be unhappy.
$endgroup$